Co-Console alternative

AquipCore vs Co-Console for commissioning, completions and handover.

Prometheus Co-Console is positioned for commissioning, completions and handover across construction and infrastructure projects. AquipCore is focused on project completions teams that want field evidence, punch, certificates, dashboards and turnover dossiers in one Microsoft-aligned record.

CapabilityAquipCoreCo-Console
Primary fitCompletions, commissioning, punch, preservation, certificates, dashboards and handover for capital projects.Commissioning and completions management across construction and infrastructure projects, including project data, work breakdown structures, users and template documents.
Completion chainITRs, walkdowns, punch, MC, RFSU, RFO and turnover evidence stay connected to one system, sub-system and tag record.Supports commissioning/completions breakdowns, certification processes, check sheets, reports and electronic handover packages.
Dashboards and reportingProject-ready skyline, build, execute and preservation dashboards, with Power BI-ready reporting.Offers built-in report design and dashboards for project details, milestones, punch and progress reporting.
Deployment modelConfigured around owner, EPC or commissioning specialist workflows, including tenant branding and Microsoft identity alignment.Part of the broader Prometheus Group asset and project software portfolio.
Best forTeams that want a focused completions system tightly aligned to Microsoft identity, Azure, SharePoint and Power BI.Organisations evaluating an established Prometheus commissioning and completions product or already using Prometheus tools.

When AquipCore may be the better fit

Choose AquipCore when the completions and handover workflow needs to be configured tightly around a specific owner, EPC, commissioning team, tenant brand, integration environment or handover pack requirement.

  • You need MC, RFSU, RFO and turnover evidence generated from live completion status.
  • You want field inspection capture, punch, preservation and dashboards in one clean chain.
  • You need Microsoft identity, Azure hosting, SharePoint alignment or Power BI-ready reporting.
  • You want a focused completions platform with Aquip-led workflow, reporting and integration delivery.

What to compare in a demo

Ask both systems to show the same handover path, from field inspection to signed certificate and turnover dossier.

  • How does a failed check sheet line become a punch item and then close out?
  • Can system readiness, punch, preservation and certificates reconcile instantly?
  • How quickly can the team configure project-specific certification gates?
  • How are project-specific integrations, dashboards and handover outputs delivered?